← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jun 2026

Summary

Google SWE coding round, got hit with a classic cache design problem. Nothing too surprising but the O(1) constraint is where people usually trip up if they haven't thought about it before.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design and implement an LRU Cache that supports get and put operations, both running in O(1) time. When the cache is full, the least recently used entry should be evicted on insert.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The problem itself isn't hard to understand but I fumbled for a minute on the data structure choice.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the requirements and constraints, then propose a hash map combined with a doubly linked list to achieve O(1) operations. Walk through the design, implement the core methods, and analyze time and space complexity.

Pro tip: Mention that you would use a doubly linked list with sentinel head and tail nodes to simplify edge cases, and discuss how this design can be extended for thread safety or persistence if needed.

1. Clarify Requirements

Ask about cache size, eviction policy, concurrency needs, and expected operation frequency to ensure alignment with the interviewer.

2. Propose Data Structures

Explain that a hash map provides O(1) access to nodes, and a doubly linked list maintains recency order for O(1) updates and evictions.

3. Detail Operations

Describe how get moves a node to the front (most recently used) and put inserts or updates, evicting the tail (least recently used) when capacity is exceeded.

4. Implement Code

Write clean code for the LRU cache class, using sentinel nodes to avoid null checks, and test with edge cases like capacity 1 and repeated updates.

5. Analyze Complexity

State that both get and put run in O(1) time and O(capacity) space, and discuss potential trade-offs or extensions.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map for O(1) key lookup
  • Doubly linked list for O(1) recency updates
  • Sentinel nodes to simplify boundary conditions
  • Eviction of least recently used entry from the tail
  • Thread safety considerations (e.g., locks) if required
  • Time and space complexity analysis

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.