← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jun 2026

Summary

Google SWE interview that revolved entirely around one problem with three escalating phases. Felt manageable at first but the third variant tripped me up more than I expected.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

Given a list of words, return the top-k or bottom-k most or least frequent words.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Started with a hashmap for counts, then a heap for the top-k part.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem: confirm whether the input is a list of words (with duplicates) or a stream, and whether we need top-k or bottom-k, most or least frequent. Then propose a solution using a hash map to count frequencies, followed by a heap or bucket sort to extract the k words, discussing trade-offs between time and space.

Pro tip: Mention that for large datasets, a distributed approach like MapReduce can be used, and for streaming data, a space-saving algorithm like Misra-Gries or Count-Min Sketch can approximate frequencies. This shows you think beyond the basic algorithm and consider scalability.

1. Clarify requirements

Ask about input size, whether words are case-sensitive, if ties need a specific order, and if k can be larger than the number of unique words. Also confirm if the list is static or streaming.

2. Count frequencies

Use a hash map to count occurrences of each word. This takes O(n) time and O(m) space, where m is the number of unique words.

3. Select top/bottom k

Use a min-heap of size k for top-k most frequent (or max-heap for bottom-k) to achieve O(m log k) time. Alternatively, use bucket sort for O(m) time when frequencies are bounded by n.

4. Handle ties and ordering

If ties occur, decide on a secondary ordering (e.g., lexicographical) and implement it in the comparator. Mention that this can affect the choice of data structure.

5. Analyze complexity and edge cases

Discuss time and space complexity, and consider edge cases like k=0, k > unique words, empty input, or all words having the same frequency.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map for frequency counting
  • Heap (priority queue) for top-k selection
  • Bucket sort for O(n) time when frequencies are bounded
  • Time and space complexity trade-offs
  • Handling ties and secondary ordering
  • Scalability for large datasets (e.g., MapReduce, streaming algorithms)

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

How would you modify your solution to handle a stream of incoming words and maintain the top-k or bottom-k most frequent words in real time?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offsSystem Design
Author's notes

This is where it got interesting.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the requirements: stream processing, real-time updates, and whether exact or approximate counts are acceptable. Then propose a data structure like a hash map for counts combined with a min-heap or max-heap for top-k, and discuss trade-offs between exact and approximate methods (e.g., Count-Min Sketch). Finally, address scalability and latency concerns for high-throughput streams.

Pro tip: Mention that for very high-throughput streams, exact top-k may be infeasible, so approximate algorithms like Count-Min Sketch with a heap are often used in practice, and highlight the trade-off between accuracy and resource usage.

1. Clarify requirements

Ask about stream rate, memory constraints, exact vs approximate results, and whether the top-k needs to be updated continuously or on demand.

2. Choose data structures

Propose a hash map to maintain word frequencies and a heap (min-heap for top-k, max-heap for bottom-k) to track the k most frequent words efficiently.

3. Handle updates in real time

Describe how each incoming word updates the hash map and potentially the heap, ensuring O(1) average update time and O(log k) heap adjustments.

4. Address scalability and trade-offs

Discuss distributed processing (e.g., sharding by word), approximate algorithms (Count-Min Sketch, Space-Saving), and trade-offs between accuracy, memory, and latency.

5. Consider edge cases and optimizations

Mention handling of word eviction (e.g., sliding window), concurrency, and potential use of a Trie for prefix-based queries if needed.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map for frequency counting with O(1) average update
  • Heap (min-heap for top-k, max-heap for bottom-k) for efficient retrieval of k most frequent
  • Trade-offs between exact and approximate algorithms (e.g., Count-Min Sketch, Lossy Counting)
  • Distributed stream processing (e.g., sharding, parallel heaps) for scalability
  • Sliding window or time-decay models for real-time relevance
  • Concurrency and synchronization in multi-threaded environments

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

Same streaming problem, but now each word should only be counted once regardless of how many times it appears. How does that change your approach?

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Honestly the trickiest part of the whole thing.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Recognize that the problem shifts from frequency counting to distinct element tracking. Use a hash set to store seen words, and only emit a word the first time it is encountered. Discuss trade-offs between memory usage and correctness, and consider if order matters.

Pro tip: Mention that this is essentially a deduplication problem and that using a set is optimal for O(1) lookups, but be prepared to discuss memory constraints and alternatives like Bloom filters for large-scale streams.

1. Clarify requirements

Confirm that each word should be output exactly once, regardless of repetitions, and ask whether the output order matters (e.g., first occurrence order).

2. Choose data structure

Select a hash set to track seen words because it provides average O(1) insertion and lookup, ensuring efficient deduplication.

3. Design algorithm

For each incoming word, check if it exists in the set. If not, add it to the set and emit it; otherwise, skip it.

4. Analyze complexity

State that time complexity is O(n) for n words, and space complexity is O(u) where u is the number of unique words, which could be large.

5. Discuss scalability

Address potential memory issues with massive streams and suggest alternatives like approximate membership (Bloom filters) if exactness is not required, or external storage if it is.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash set for O(1) lookups and insertions
  • Time complexity O(n), space complexity O(u)
  • Order of output: first occurrence vs any order
  • Memory constraints and scalability for large streams
  • Trade-offs between exact and approximate solutions (e.g., Bloom filters)
  • Handling of duplicates and ensuring each word is emitted once

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.