← Bloomberg Interview Insights
I went straight for a hashmap keyed by id, which was the right call for O(1) lookups on get and delete.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a design using a hash map for O(1) access by ID and a list or ordered structure for retrieval. Discuss thread safety with synchronization or concurrent collections, and address edge cases like duplicate IDs, missing entries, and external completion status.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of trade-offs by mentioning that the external helper for completion status could be a bottleneck, and suggest caching or lazy evaluation. Also, proactively discuss how to handle concurrent modifications during iteration.
Ask about expected scale, concurrency needs, and whether ordering matters. Confirm if IDs are unique and auto-generated or provided.
Propose an Entry class with id, description, and other metadata. Choose a HashMap for O(1) access by ID and a concurrent structure like ConcurrentHashMap for thread safety, plus a list for ordered retrieval if needed.
Describe add (generate ID, store entry), delete (remove by ID), get by ID (lookup), and get all (return collection). Discuss how to integrate the external completion helper, perhaps by calling it on retrieval or caching results.
Explain synchronization strategies: use ConcurrentHashMap for thread-safe operations, or synchronize methods. Discuss atomicity for compound operations and potential race conditions.
Cover duplicate IDs, missing entries, null inputs, and concurrent modifications. Discuss trade-offs between different data structures (e.g., HashMap vs TreeMap for ordering) and performance implications.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.