← Robinhood Interview Insights
The classification logic itself is fine, close vs open comparison is trivial.
Start by clarifying the exact format of the OHLC records and the classification rules (e.g., what constitutes a doji). Then outline a single-pass algorithm that scans the string character by character, parsing fields on the fly without splitting into arrays, and appends the classification character to a result string. Emphasize O(1) extra space and O(n) time, and discuss edge cases like empty records, missing fields, or non-numeric values.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a state machine or index-based parsing to avoid creating intermediate strings, and that you'd validate numeric fields using a custom parser to handle potential overflow or malformed input. Also, note that you'd test with a large input to ensure performance and memory constraints are met.
Ask about the exact format: are there always 4 fields? What defines a doji (e.g., open == close)? How to handle whitespace, empty fields, or non-numeric values? Confirm that invalid records should produce 'X'.
Plan to iterate over the string once, using indices to delimit records (semicolon) and fields (comma). Parse each field as a number without creating substrings, and track the current field index.
After parsing all four fields, compare open and close: if open < close, append 'B'; if open > close, append 'S'; if equal, append 'D'. If any field is invalid or missing, append 'X'.
During parsing, if a field is empty, non-numeric, or if there are not exactly 4 fields, mark the record as invalid and skip to the next semicolon. Ensure the output string is built efficiently (e.g., using a byte buffer or strings.Builder).
Confirm O(n) time and O(1) extra space (excluding output). Discuss testing with large inputs, malformed records, and performance benchmarks.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.