← Microsoft Interview Insights
The core of it is just argmax at each step, but I spent too long overthinking whether they wanted me to handle log-probabilities vs raw logits.
Start by clarifying the interface for the model's next-token function, specifying inputs (e.g., current sequence) and outputs (probability distribution over vocabulary). Then outline the greedy decoding loop: at each step, select the token with the highest probability, append it to the sequence, and stop when EOS is generated or max length is reached. Finally, discuss trade-offs and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Mention that greedy decoding is deterministic and fast but can lead to suboptimal sequences; briefly contrast with beam search to show awareness of alternatives. Also, emphasize handling edge cases like EOS as the first token or max length reached.
Specify the next-token function signature, e.g., `next_token_probs(sequence: List[int]) -> List[float]`, which returns a probability distribution over the vocabulary given the current sequence.
Start with a beginning-of-sequence (BOS) token or an empty list, depending on the model's convention. Set up a loop with a maximum length constraint.
At each step, call the next-token function with the current sequence, select the token with the highest probability (argmax), and append it to the sequence.
Stop if the selected token is the end-of-sequence (EOS) token or if the sequence length reaches the maximum allowed length. Return the generated sequence (excluding or including EOS as per requirement).
Mention that greedy decoding is efficient but may not yield globally optimal sequences. Optionally, discuss caching, batching, or using log-probabilities for numerical stability.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.