This one took me a second to settle into because Q being non-symmetric felt like a trick at first.
First, symmetrize Q by noting that x^T Q x = x^T (Q+Q^T)/2 x, so only the symmetric part matters for the quadratic term. Then analyze convexity and coercivity: a finite minimum exists iff the symmetric part is positive semidefinite and the linear term lies in its range. Characterize the minimizer set as an affine subspace and compute the optimal value using the pseudoinverse.
Pro tip: Emphasize that Q's asymmetry is irrelevant for the quadratic form; always symmetrize first. Also, mention that if the symmetric part is positive semidefinite but singular, the problem may still have a finite minimum if the linear term is in the range, and the solution set is affine.
Replace Q with its symmetric part Q_s = (Q + Q^T)/2, since x^T Q x = x^T Q_s x for all x. This simplifies analysis without changing the problem.
Examine the eigenvalues of Q_s. If Q_s is positive definite, f is strictly convex and coercive, so a unique finite minimum exists. If Q_s is positive semidefinite, f is convex but not strictly; a finite minimum exists iff the linear term c is in the range of Q_s (i.e., orthogonal to the null space of Q_s). If Q_s has a negative eigenvalue, f is unbounded below.
When a finite minimum exists, the minimizers are the solutions to the linear system Q_s x = -c/2 (or equivalently, the gradient condition). The solution set is an affine subspace: x* + null(Q_s), where x* is any particular solution (e.g., obtained via pseudoinverse).
The optimal value is f(x*) = - (1/4) c^T Q_s^+ c, where Q_s^+ is the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of Q_s. This formula holds when c is in the range of Q_s.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.