The constraint here is that all three levers are locked, which is the whole point.
Acknowledge the constraints and reframe the problem as a prioritization challenge, not a capacity one. Propose a data-driven framework to evaluate features based on impact and effort, and facilitate stakeholder alignment on the top 6 features that deliver the most value. Commit to delivering those 6 exceptionally well while creating a transparent backlog for the rest.
Pro tip: Don't just present a prioritization framework—show how you'd use it to drive a decision with stakeholders, including handling disagreements and securing buy-in. Emphasize that delivering 6 high-impact features is better than 12 mediocre ones, and tie it back to user and business outcomes.
Acknowledge the constraints and reframe the challenge as an opportunity to focus on highest-impact work. Emphasize that delivering fewer features well is better than many poorly.
Use a prioritization framework (e.g., RICE, WSJF) to objectively rank features by impact, effort, and strategic alignment. Gather data on user needs, business value, and technical feasibility.
Facilitate a workshop to review the prioritization and agree on the top 6 features. Address concerns by showing trade-offs and the cost of trying to do all 12.
Commit to delivering the top 6 with high quality and set clear expectations. Create a transparent roadmap for the remaining features, with a plan to revisit after the 6 months.
Track progress and be ready to adjust if priorities change. Keep stakeholders informed with regular updates and celebrate the delivery of the selected features.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.