← Microsoft Interview Insights
I started with the data flow, which felt like the right move.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale (e.g., log volume, retention, query patterns), then design a pipeline with ingestion, buffering, storage, and query layers. Focus on trade-offs between durability, latency, and cost, and address multi-tenancy and fault tolerance explicitly.
Pro tip: Emphasize decoupling components with a durable buffer like Kafka to handle bursts and partial outages, and discuss how to enforce tenant isolation at every layer to prevent noisy neighbors.
Ask questions to understand expected log volume (e.g., TB/day), retention periods, query latency SLAs, and tenant isolation needs. This ensures the design meets actual needs without over-engineering.
Propose a scalable ingestion layer (e.g., HTTP endpoints, agents) that writes to a durable, partitioned buffer like Kafka to absorb bursts and decouple producers from consumers.
Choose a storage solution (e.g., Elasticsearch, ClickHouse, or object storage with indexing) that supports efficient queries by time, service, host, level, and trace ID, and implement retention policies via tiering or TTL.
Design a query service that enforces access control per tenant and optimizes queries with appropriate partitioning and indexing. Ensure isolation to prevent cross-tenant data leaks and performance interference.
Discuss how the system handles partial outages (e.g., buffer replication, retries) and scales horizontally at each layer. Mention monitoring and backpressure mechanisms.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.