The actual value generation was fine, standard row-by-row accumulation.
Start by clarifying the exact formatting requirements and edge cases, then outline a two-phase solution: first generate the triangle values, then compute the maximum width and format each row with proper padding and centering. Emphasize modularity and testability, and discuss trade-offs between precomputing all rows versus generating row-by-row.
Pro tip: Mention that the centering indent for each row can be computed as (maxWidth + gap) * (height - rowIndex - 1) / 2, and that using string formatting with dynamic width simplifies the implementation. Also, proactively discuss how you would handle large heights and potential integer overflow.
Ask about input constraints (e.g., height range), expected output format (spaces vs tabs), and how to handle height 0 or negative. Confirm that numbers should be right-padded to the max width and that the gap equals that width.
Use a simple iterative approach: start with [1], then each new row is built from the previous by summing adjacent elements with 1s at the ends. Store all rows in a list for later formatting.
Find the largest number in the triangle (the middle element of the last row) and determine its string length. This width will be used for padding each number and as the gap between numbers.
For each row, convert numbers to strings padded to max width, join with a gap of max width spaces. Then prepend an indent of ((maxWidth + gap) * (height - rowIndex - 1)) // 2 spaces to center the row.
Test with small heights (1, 2, 3) and a larger one (e.g., 5) to verify symmetry. Discuss time/space complexity (O(n^2) time and space) and possible optimizations like generating row-by-row without storing all rows if only printing is needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.