My first instinct was just brute force every column left to right and scan down.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose an efficient algorithm that leverages the sorted rows. A common optimal approach is to start from the top-right corner and move left or down based on the current value, achieving O(m+n) time. Alternatively, use binary search on each row to find the first 1 and track the minimum column index, which takes O(m log n) time.
Pro tip: Mention the trade-offs between the O(m+n) staircase approach and the O(m log n) binary search approach, and note that the staircase method is optimal when m and n are similar, while binary search may be better if n is much larger than m. Also, discuss how to handle large matrices that don't fit in memory, showing awareness of scalability.
Ask about matrix dimensions, whether rows can be empty, and if the matrix is sorted row-wise only or also column-wise. Confirm the definition of 'leftmost column' and the return value when no 1 exists.
Mention that scanning all columns from left to right and checking each row would be O(m*n) time, which is inefficient. This sets the stage for optimization.
Describe the staircase method: start at the top-right corner. If the current cell is 1, update the answer and move left; if 0, move down. This finds the leftmost column with a 1 in O(m+n) time.
Explain that the staircase method uses O(1) extra space and O(m+n) time. Compare with binary search per row (O(m log n)) and justify why the staircase is optimal for this problem.
Walk through examples: all zeros, all ones, single row/column, and matrices where the leftmost 1 is in the first column. Verify the algorithm returns -1 when no 1 exists.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.