← Anthropic Interview Insights
The base problem was pretty straightforward.
Start by clarifying requirements (scale, file types, performance needs) and then outline a two-phase approach: first group files by size to quickly eliminate non-duplicates, then compute cryptographic hashes (e.g., SHA-256) only for files with matching sizes to confirm duplicates. Discuss trade-offs between full-file hashing and chunk-based hashing, and consider memory and I/O constraints.
Pro tip: Mention that you can optimize by hashing only the first few kilobytes of files with matching sizes to quickly filter out most non-duplicates, then fall back to full hashing for the remainder—this significantly reduces I/O for large files.
Ask about scale (number of files, total size), file types, performance requirements, and whether the system is batch or real-time. This shapes the algorithm and data structures.
Phase 1: Group files by size using a hash map (size -> list of file paths). Phase 2: For each group with more than one file, compute a strong hash (e.g., SHA-256) and group by hash to identify duplicates.
Discuss using partial hashing (e.g., first 4KB) to reduce I/O, then full hashing only for collisions. Consider chunk-based hashing (e.g., Rabin fingerprinting) for large files or incremental deduplication.
Address empty files, symbolic links, and concurrent modifications. For scalability, discuss external sorting or distributed processing if the dataset doesn't fit in memory.
Compare time/space complexity of different approaches, and discuss trade-offs between accuracy (hash collisions) and performance. Mention that cryptographic hashes make collisions negligible.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.