← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Onsite - Multi Round·Junior

JuniorRejected
May 2026USA

Summary

Went through Google's early career software engineering process in the US and it was harder than expected. Four rounds total, two behavioral and two technical, and the technical side had some genuinely tricky moments. Ended up rejected, but leaving notes here for anyone prepping.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Given a code environment with a filesystem and a readme, identify and fix any issues in a data processing workflow.

Root Cause AnalysisTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This one threw me completely.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by thoroughly reading the README to understand the intended workflow and expected outputs. Then systematically inspect the filesystem, trace the data flow, and identify discrepancies between expected and actual behavior. Finally, propose and implement fixes, validating each change with tests or sample runs.

Pro tip: Always reproduce the issue first and confirm the root cause before making changes; premature fixes can mask the real problem and introduce new bugs.

1. Understand the intended workflow

Read the README and any documentation to grasp the purpose, inputs, outputs, and expected behavior of the data processing pipeline.

2. Explore the filesystem and code

List all files, inspect directory structure, and read relevant scripts to map out the actual implementation and data flow.

3. Identify and reproduce the issue

Run the workflow with sample data to observe failures or incorrect outputs, and trace the error to its source.

4. Fix the root cause

Modify the code or configuration to address the underlying problem, ensuring the fix aligns with the intended design.

5. Validate and document

Test the fix with the same sample data and edge cases, then update documentation or comments to reflect changes.

Key Points to Mention

  • Thoroughly reading the README to understand expected behavior and constraints
  • Tracing data flow through the filesystem and code to locate the failure point
  • Reproducing the issue with a minimal test case before attempting fixes
  • Considering trade-offs between quick fixes and robust solutions
  • Validating the fix with tests and ensuring no regressions
  • Documenting the root cause and solution for future reference

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Solve a constrained directed graph problem, given a vague input data structure.

Algorithms & Data StructuresAdaptability & Ambiguity
Author's notes

I could see the shape of the solution pretty quickly but the input format was never clearly defined.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the vague input data structure and constraints through targeted questions, then propose a solution using standard graph algorithms like BFS/DFS with appropriate modifications for constraints. Discuss trade-offs and edge cases, and be prepared to adapt your approach based on interviewer feedback.

Pro tip: Demonstrate adaptability by explicitly stating your assumptions and asking for confirmation before diving into code; this shows you can handle ambiguity and collaborate effectively.

1. Clarify the Problem

Ask questions to understand the input format, constraints, and expected output. Confirm whether the graph is weighted, directed, and what the constraints are.

2. Define the Approach

Outline a high-level algorithm (e.g., BFS, DFS, Dijkstra) that fits the clarified constraints, and explain why it's suitable.

3. Discuss Trade-offs

Compare alternative approaches in terms of time/space complexity and explain your choice based on the constraints.

4. Handle Edge Cases

Identify potential edge cases (e.g., cycles, disconnected components) and explain how your solution addresses them.

5. Implement and Test

Write clean code, then walk through a small example to verify correctness and discuss testing strategies.

Key Points to Mention

  • Graph representation (adjacency list vs. matrix) and its impact on performance
  • Algorithm choice (BFS, DFS, Dijkstra, topological sort) based on constraints
  • Time and space complexity analysis
  • Handling of cycles, negative weights, or other constraints
  • Edge cases such as empty graph, single node, or disconnected components
  • Adaptability: willingness to adjust approach based on new information

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.