← Microsoft Interview Insights
I spent way too long trying to think of it as a greedy problem before the interviewer nudged me toward DP.
Model the problem as a maximum bipartite matching with a cardinality constraint on the number of days used. Use dynamic programming over days and investors, where the state captures the number of days chosen so far and the set of investors already met, but optimize by sorting investors by availability and using bitmask DP if the number of investors is small, or a min-cost max-flow formulation for larger inputs.
Pro tip: Clarify the constraints first: if the number of investors is small (≤20), bitmask DP is ideal; if large, a flow-based approach with binary search on the number of investors is more scalable. Always discuss trade-offs between DP and flow.
Ask about the maximum number of investors, days, and k. Determine if days are discrete and if investors have arbitrary availability sets.
For small investor count, use dp[mask][d] = max investors met using d days and a subset mask of investors. For larger, consider dp over days with a bitmask of investors or a flow network.
For each day, either skip it or assign it to an available investor not yet met, updating the mask and day count. Ensure at most k days are used.
If investors > 20, use a max-flow formulation: source to investors (capacity 1), investors to days (capacity 1 if available), days to sink (capacity 1), and add a super sink with capacity k. Then binary search or use min-cost max-flow to maximize investors.
Discuss time/space complexity (e.g., O(2^n * k) for bitmask DP) and handle cases like k=0, no available days, or investors with empty availability.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.