← Bloomberg Interview Insights

Bloomberg·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
May 2026

Summary

Bloomberg SWE interview with a two-part coding problem. The first part was a classic interval merging question, and then they added a twist with busy/available flags that made things considerably more interesting.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Given a list of meeting intervals as start/end pairs, merge all overlapping intervals and return the resulting list.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Pretty standard stuff if you've done any interval problems before.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., whether intervals are sorted, if they are inclusive/exclusive, and expected input size). Then propose sorting intervals by start time and merging overlapping ones in a single pass, explaining the logic and edge cases. Finally, analyze time and space complexity and discuss potential optimizations or alternative approaches.

Pro tip: Mention that sorting is the key insight and that you can merge in-place or use a result list; also discuss how you would handle edge cases like empty input or intervals that touch exactly (e.g., [1,2] and [2,3]).

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Ask about input format, whether intervals are sorted, if they are inclusive/exclusive, and expected size. This shows attention to detail and avoids assumptions.

2. Outline the sorting-based approach

Explain that sorting by start time allows a linear scan to merge overlapping intervals. Describe how to compare the current interval's start with the last merged interval's end.

3. Walk through an example

Use a small example like [[1,3],[2,6],[8,10],[15,18]] to demonstrate the merging process step by step, highlighting how overlaps are detected and merged.

4. Analyze complexity and edge cases

State that time complexity is O(n log n) due to sorting, and space is O(n) for the output (or O(1) extra if merging in-place). Discuss edge cases: empty list, single interval, intervals that touch exactly, and unsorted input.

5. Discuss potential optimizations or alternatives

Mention that if intervals are already sorted, we can skip sorting and achieve O(n). Also note that for very large data, external sorting might be needed, but for interviews, the standard approach suffices.

Key Points to Mention

  • Sorting intervals by start time is crucial for the linear merge pass.
  • Overlap condition: next.start <= current.end (or < if exclusive).
  • Merging: update the end to max(current.end, next.end).
  • Time complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting; space: O(n) for output.
  • Edge cases: empty input, single interval, intervals that just touch, unsorted input.
  • If intervals are already sorted, time complexity reduces to O(n).

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Follow-up: each interval now has a boolean flag indicating whether it's busy or available. Output only the busy portions of the timeline, given that available intervals override busy ones wherever they overlap.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is where things got real.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify that available intervals override busy ones, then model the timeline as a sweep over sorted endpoints, tracking the current state (busy/available) with a counter or flag. Merge overlapping busy intervals and subtract any available intervals that overlap them, outputting only the remaining busy portions.

Pro tip: Explicitly discuss how you handle edge cases like adjacent intervals, zero-length intervals, and multiple overlapping available intervals—interviewers at Bloomberg value robustness and clear reasoning about boundary conditions.

1. Clarify and define the problem

Confirm that available intervals override busy ones wherever they overlap, and that the output should be the busy portions after removing any overlap with available intervals. Ask about input format, interval inclusivity, and whether intervals can be zero-length or unsorted.

2. Choose a representation and algorithm

Decide between a sweep-line approach (sort all endpoints, track state) or a merge-and-subtract approach (merge busy intervals, then subtract available intervals). Consider time/space complexity and explain your choice.

3. Implement the core logic

For sweep-line: create events for start/end of busy and available intervals, sort by time, and maintain a counter of active busy and available intervals. For merge-and-subtract: merge busy intervals, then for each available interval, split overlapping busy intervals.

4. Handle edge cases and validate

Test with adjacent intervals, fully covered busy intervals, multiple available intervals overlapping the same busy interval, and unsorted input. Ensure the output intervals are non-overlapping and sorted.

5. Analyze complexity and trade-offs

State the time complexity (e.g., O(n log n) due to sorting) and space complexity. Discuss trade-offs between the sweep-line and merge-subtract approaches in terms of code simplicity and performance.

Key Points to Mention

  • Sorting intervals by start time is essential for efficient merging and sweeping.
  • Use a state counter or flag to track whether the current segment is busy or available during a sweep.
  • Available intervals override busy ones, so any overlap must be removed from the busy output.
  • Edge cases: adjacent intervals (touching but not overlapping), zero-length intervals, and multiple available intervals covering the same busy interval.
  • Time complexity is typically O(n log n) due to sorting; space complexity is O(n) for the output and event list.
  • Consider using a priority queue or event-based sweep for streaming data if intervals are not all known upfront.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.