I started with the naive thing, single-source BFS from each gate separately, and the interviewer let me finish before asking what the complexity was.
Start by clarifying the problem and constraints, then propose a multi-source BFS from all gates simultaneously to compute shortest distances to empty rooms. Explain why BFS is optimal for unweighted grids, walk through the algorithm, and analyze time and space complexity. Finally, discuss edge cases and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Emphasize that multi-source BFS avoids redundant work by processing all gates in parallel, and mention that in-place modification of the grid is acceptable if the problem allows it, saving space.
Ask about grid size, whether gates are guaranteed, and if modifying the grid in-place is allowed. Confirm that distance is measured in number of steps (Manhattan distance) and that walls block movement.
Explain that you'll enqueue all gates initially, then perform BFS level by level, updating empty rooms with the current distance. This ensures each room gets the minimum distance from any gate.
Compare with running BFS from each empty room (O(rooms * gates) worst-case) or Dijkstra (overkill for unweighted). Highlight that multi-source BFS is O(m*n) time and handles multiple gates efficiently.
State time complexity O(m*n) since each cell is visited once, and space O(m*n) for the queue. Discuss edge cases: no gates (return unchanged), fully enclosed rooms (remain INF), and large grids (BFS is optimal).
Mention using a queue, directions array, and in-place updates. Optionally, suggest using a 2D array for distances if in-place is not allowed, and note that BFS naturally handles multiple gates.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.