The follow/unfollow part is trivial, a set per user and you're done.
Start by clarifying requirements: scale, snapshot frequency, and query patterns. Then propose a design that combines a persistent graph store with versioned snapshots, using techniques like copy-on-write or append-only logs. Discuss trade-offs between storage, latency, and consistency, and outline how to implement the four operations efficiently.
Pro tip: Emphasize that snapshots can be implemented as immutable views over a versioned edge list, avoiding full copies. Also, mention that for ML applications at Uber, such historical graphs enable temporal link prediction and feature engineering.
Ask about expected number of users, follow operations per second, snapshot frequency, and query patterns (e.g., point-in-time queries, range queries). This informs storage and indexing choices.
Propose a versioned edge list where each follow/unfollow is an event with a timestamp or version. Use an append-only log or a graph database with temporal support. Consider partitioning by user or time for scalability.
Snapshots can be created by recording the current version number or by materializing a view. Use copy-on-write or persistent data structures to avoid full copies. Ensure snapshots are immutable and queryable.
For Follow/Unfollow, append events. For IsFollowing, check the latest event before the snapshot version. For CreateSnapshot, record the current version. Discuss indexing for fast lookups.
Compare approaches: full snapshot vs. delta, in-memory vs. disk-based, consistency vs. latency. Mention caching, compression, and garbage collection of old versions if needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.