← IXL Learning Interview Insights
My first instinct was to just count total occurrences, which is wrong.
Clarify the problem definition, then propose a BFS traversal that tracks the set of distinct values at each depth. For each value, maintain a set of depths it appears at, and finally return the value with the largest set size. Discuss correctness, complexity, and edge cases.
Pro tip: Mention that using a set per value avoids double-counting the same value at the same depth, which is crucial for the 'distinct depth levels' requirement. Also, note that if multiple values tie, you can return any or all depending on the interviewer's preference.
Confirm that 'depth' starts at 0 or 1, and that we need the value appearing on the most distinct depth levels (not the most total occurrences). Ask if ties should return all values or any one.
Use BFS (level-order traversal) to process nodes level by level. Maintain a hash map from value to a set of depths where it appears.
For each node at depth d, add d to the set for its value. Use a queue to process nodes level by level, incrementing depth after each level.
After traversal, iterate through the map and track the value with the largest set size. Handle ties as clarified.
Argue that BFS visits each node once, and the set ensures distinct depths are counted. Time complexity is O(N) where N is number of nodes; space is O(N) for the map and queue.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.