← Cloudflare Interview Insights
Seemed like a warmup question but the follow-up is where it gets real.
Start by affirming your experience with code reviews, then describe your approach as a balance between technical rigor and team collaboration. Emphasize how you tailor feedback to the context—whether it's a critical production fix or a learning opportunity for a junior engineer—and how you foster a positive review culture.
Pro tip: Frame code reviews as a two-way learning process: you not only catch issues but also learn from others' approaches. Mention that you sometimes ask questions instead of giving direct commands to encourage critical thinking.
Explain that the goal of code review is to improve code quality, share knowledge, and catch bugs early—not to criticize the author.
Focus on correctness, security, and maintainability first; then style and minor improvements. Use labels like 'nit' for non-blocking suggestions.
Offer concrete suggestions and explain the 'why' behind your comments. Ask questions to understand the author's reasoning before assuming mistakes.
Adjust your review depth based on urgency, author experience, and code criticality. For hotfixes, focus on the fix; for new features, consider design and tests.
Ensure your feedback is addressed, and reflect on what you learned from the review to improve your own code.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.