My first instinct was to do both aggregations in one big join and i immediately tangled myself up with duplicate counts.
Break the problem into two parts: first aggregate engagement events per user by joining posts to engagement events, then aggregate follower counts per user from the follows table. Combine these using a FULL OUTER JOIN or UNION to ensure users with only posts or only followers are included, and sum the counts to get the influence score.
Pro tip: Mention that you would handle users with no posts or no followers by using COALESCE to treat NULLs as zero, and consider whether to use a LEFT JOIN from users to both aggregates to include all users. Also, clarify that engagement events should be counted only for posts authored by the user, not for engagements the user made on others' posts.
Confirm the table structures: users (user_id), posts (post_id, user_id), engagement_events (event_id, post_id, user_id?), follows (follower_id, followee_id). Define influence score as total engagement events on user's posts plus total followers.
Join posts to engagement_events on post_id, group by posts.user_id, and count the number of engagement events. This gives total engagements per user's posts.
From the follows table, group by followee_id (the user being followed) and count the number of followers. This gives total follower count per user.
Use a FULL OUTER JOIN or UNION of the two aggregates on user_id, then sum the engagement count and follower count, using COALESCE to handle NULLs as zero. Optionally, join back to users to include all users.
Check edge cases: users with no posts, no followers, or both. Consider indexing on foreign keys and using subqueries or CTEs for readability. Discuss potential performance implications.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
This one took me longer than i'd like to admit.
First, aggregate the raw follower events into monthly new follower counts per user. Then, use window functions (LAG for previous month, SUM OVER for cumulative total) and handle divide-by-zero in the growth rate calculation. Finally, ensure the output is ordered by user and month for readability.
Pro tip: Always clarify the grain of the data and the definition of 'monthly follower growth'—whether it's based on follow events or net changes—and confirm the expected output schema with the interviewer before writing the query.
Identify the table containing follower events (e.g., user_id, follower_id, follow_date) and clarify what 'new followers gained each month' means (e.g., count of distinct followers per user per month).
Write a subquery or CTE that groups by user and month, counting new followers. Use DATE_TRUNC or equivalent to extract the month from the follow date.
Use LAG to get the previous month's new follower count, and SUM OVER with an ORDER BY month to compute the running total of followers per user.
Compute (current_month - previous_month) / previous_month, using NULLIF or CASE to avoid division by zero when previous_month is 0 or NULL.
Select the required columns (user_id, month, new_followers, prev_month_followers, growth_rate, cumulative_followers) and order by user_id and month for clarity.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.