I spent the first two minutes just restating the problem back, which felt like stalling but actually helped me get my footing.
Acknowledge the evidence but reframe the decision as a trade-off between short-term engagement and long-term ecosystem health. Propose a structured evaluation using metrics beyond social activity, such as content diversity, user retention, and creator ecosystem balance. Recommend running a controlled experiment to measure net impact before making a final call.
Pro tip: Emphasize that at Meta, decisions are made with a long-term user value lens, not just immediate engagement. Show you understand that increasing stranger content might boost short-term metrics but could harm user well-being and retention if not carefully balanced.
Define what 'socially active' means and what business objective the increase in stranger posts aims to achieve. Consider platform values like meaningful social interactions and user well-being.
List pros (e.g., discovery, new connections, content diversity) and cons (e.g., reduced social interaction, echo chambers, user dissatisfaction). Map these to short-term and long-term metrics.
Propose an A/B test with a treatment group seeing more stranger posts. Define success metrics including engagement (likes, comments, shares), retention, content diversity, and user sentiment.
Evaluate results across user segments (e.g., new vs. existing users, heavy vs. light socializers). Look for heterogeneous treatment effects and net impact on overall ecosystem health.
Decide whether to proceed, and if so, under what conditions (e.g., cap on stranger posts, personalization). Suggest ongoing monitoring and iteration.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.