← MathWorks Interview Insights
The first instinct is binary search on the answer, which is right, but I almost missed the 'exactly K' part.
First, clarify the problem and constraints, then explain that the optimal strategy is to binary search on the answer X, checking if it's possible to make all elements at least X using at most K decrements. For a given X, compute the total decrements needed as sum(max(0, a_i - X)) and compare with K.
Pro tip: Mention that the answer is monotonic: if X is achievable, any smaller value is also achievable, which justifies binary search. Also, note that the problem is equivalent to finding the largest X such that the sum of excesses above X is ≤ K.
Restate the problem in your own words and confirm with the interviewer: we need to maximize the minimum element after exactly K decrements. Ask about constraints (e.g., array size, value ranges) to determine the expected time complexity.
Explain that if we can achieve a minimum value of X, we can also achieve any value less than X by simply not using all decrements or by decrementing further. This monotonicity allows binary search on the answer.
For a candidate minimum X, compute the total number of decrements needed to make every element at least X: sum(max(0, a_i - X)). If this sum is ≤ K, then X is feasible.
Set low = min(array) - K (or 0 if negative) and high = min(array). While low ≤ high, check mid; if feasible, move low up, else move high down. Return the largest feasible X.
Time complexity: O(n log(max_value)) due to binary search and O(n) check. Space: O(1). Discuss edge cases: K=0, K very large (answer can be negative), all elements equal, etc.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.