← JP Morgan Interview Insights
I started with short-code generation and spent probably too long debating hashing versus a counter with base62 encoding versus a distributed ID approach.
Start by clarifying requirements (read/write ratio, scale, latency, analytics needs) and then walk through the high-level design: API, short-code generation, storage, caching, and click tracking. Emphasize trade-offs, especially around code generation (hash vs. counter), database choice (SQL vs. NoSQL), and caching strategy, while keeping the design scalable and fault-tolerant.
Pro tip: At JP Morgan, reliability and data integrity are paramount, so highlight how you would handle failures (e.g., database replication, cache fallback) and ensure click tracking is accurate and not lost, perhaps using a message queue for asynchronous processing.
Ask about expected traffic (e.g., 100M URLs, 10K writes/sec, 100K reads/sec), read/write ratio, latency requirements, and whether analytics are needed. This sets the stage for design decisions.
Define the API endpoints (e.g., POST /shorten, GET /{code}) and sketch the components: load balancer, web servers, database, cache, and analytics pipeline. Explain the flow from URL submission to redirection.
Compare approaches: hash-based (e.g., MD5 then base62) vs. counter-based (e.g., distributed counter with base62). Discuss trade-offs: collision handling, predictability, and scalability. Recommend a counter-based approach with a distributed ID generator (e.g., Snowflake) for uniqueness and scalability.
Choose a database (e.g., NoSQL like Cassandra for scalability or SQL for ACID) and design the schema (short_code -> long_url, metadata). Implement caching (e.g., Redis) with LRU eviction to handle read-heavy traffic, and discuss cache invalidation and TTL.
Design a scalable click tracking system: log clicks asynchronously (e.g., to Kafka) and process them for real-time or batch analytics. Discuss how to avoid impacting redirection latency and ensure data accuracy.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.