My first instinct was to just flatten everything and filter, which works but I kept second-guessing myself on the dedup step.
Clarify the input format and edge cases, then propose a solution using a set to collect followees-of-followees and subtract the user's direct follows. Discuss time and space complexity, and consider if the graph is large or if the user has many followees.
Pro tip: Mention that you would handle the case where the user is not in the graph or has no followees, and that you'd use a set for O(1) lookups and deduplication. Also, note that the order doesn't matter, so a set is ideal.
Ask clarifying questions: Is the graph directed? Can there be cycles? Should we include the user themselves if they appear? What if the user has no followees?
Explain that you will iterate over the user's followees, then for each followee, iterate over their followees. Collect all into a set, then remove the user's direct followees and the user themselves if present.
Use the given example to demonstrate: for user A, followees are B and C. B follows C and D; C follows E. Collect {C, D, E}, remove direct follows {B, C}, result {D, E}.
State that time complexity is O(F * G) where F is number of followees and G is average number of followees per followee, but more precisely O(total edges from followees). Space complexity is O(R) where R is the result size.
Mention handling missing keys, empty followees, and potential for large graphs. Suggest using a set for deduplication and O(1) membership checks.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.