← Booking.com Interview Insights
I spent the first minute just restating the user story back to them which, in retrospect, was a waste of time.
Start by critiquing the user story against INVEST criteria, identifying its ambiguity and lack of user value. Then propose a refined story with clear acceptance criteria, and outline the steps to prepare it for the backlog, including prioritization, estimation, and dependencies.
Pro tip: Frame the story around the user's need to trust the app, not just see errors. This shifts the focus from technical implementation to user value, which resonates with stakeholders.
Evaluate the story against INVEST criteria: it's independent, negotiable, valuable, estimable, small, and testable. Identify issues: vague terms like 'recently' and 'problem', and lack of clear user benefit.
Rewrite the story to be specific and valuable. For example: 'As a user, I want to see a clear indicator when my calendar changes haven't synced in the last 5 minutes, so I can take action to resolve the issue and trust my calendar.'
Specify measurable conditions: e.g., indicator appears if sync fails for >5 minutes, shows last successful sync time, and provides a way to retry or troubleshoot.
Break down into tasks, estimate effort, identify dependencies (e.g., sync service, UI components), and prioritize based on user impact and business value.
Think about offline mode, multiple devices, and how to measure success (e.g., reduction in support tickets, increased user trust).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.