Start by clarifying the product goal and constraints, then propose a two-stage architecture: candidate generation using spatial indexing (e.g., geohash or H3) to retrieve nearby previously-viewed listings, followed by a ranking model that scores candidates based on user-listing affinity and recency. Finally, define evaluation metrics and explain how offline changes translate to online A/B tests, emphasizing the feedback loop between model updates and live metrics.
Pro tip: Emphasize the importance of counterfactual evaluation and guardrail metrics to avoid degrading user experience when re-surfacing listings; show awareness that re-surfacing can cannibalize new listing discovery and must be balanced with exploration.
Ask questions to understand the product context: what is the goal (e.g., increase bookings, engagement), what data is available (view history, location, time), and what are the latency and scale requirements. Define success metrics (e.g., CTR, booking rate) and guardrails (e.g., user satisfaction, diversity).
Propose a spatial index like geohash, H3, or Quadtree to efficiently retrieve previously-viewed listings within a radius of the user's current location. Discuss trade-offs (precision vs. recall, indexing cost) and how to handle dynamic user locations and listing availability.
Outline a machine learning ranking model (e.g., GBDT, DNN) that takes features from user, listing, and context (e.g., time since last view, price, distance) to predict relevance or booking probability. Mention two-stage ranking (coarse then fine) and how to incorporate business rules.
Specify offline metrics (e.g., NDCG, recall@k) and online metrics (e.g., CTR, conversion rate, revenue). Explain how to set up A/B tests to measure the impact of model changes, including sample size calculation and experiment duration.
Describe the feedback loop: how offline evaluation predicts online performance, how to monitor for drift, and how to iterate. Discuss potential pitfalls like feedback loops, position bias, and the need for counterfactual logging.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.