The part that tripped me up wasn't parsing, it was scope.
Start by clarifying the language's syntax and semantics, then design a modular interpreter with separate lexer, parser, and evaluator components. Emphasize extensibility for future features like conditionals and loops, and discuss trade-offs between tree-walking and bytecode approaches.
Pro tip: Mention that you'll use an AST-based tree-walking interpreter for simplicity and extensibility, and that you'll structure the environment to support nested scopes for future functions. This shows foresight and practical design sense.
Ask questions to pin down syntax, supported operations, error handling, and performance expectations. Confirm that the core is a REPL or script runner and that extensibility is key.
Outline a classic interpreter pipeline: lexer -> parser -> AST -> evaluator. Explain how each component will be modular to allow adding new features without major rewrites.
Sketch a simple grammar for assignments, arithmetic expressions, and print statements. Define AST node types (e.g., Assign, BinaryOp, Print) that can be extended later.
Describe a tree-walking evaluator that maintains an environment (symbol table) for variables. Discuss handling of arithmetic operations and print output.
Explain how you would add conditionals, loops, and functions in follow-up rounds. For example, introduce control flow nodes, block scoping, and function objects with closures.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.