← Capital One Interview Insights
The reverseRow and swap parts were fine, pretty mechanical.
Clarify the matrix dimensions, command semantics, and edge cases before coding. Choose an in-place or copy-based implementation based on constraints, then implement each command as a separate function and test with small examples. Discuss time/space complexity and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Mention that rotation can be done in-place by first transposing the matrix and then reversing each row, which saves memory and shows deeper understanding. Also, proactively ask about command frequency and matrix size to decide between eager and lazy execution.
Ask about matrix dimensions, command formats, and whether commands can be invalid. Confirm if the matrix should be modified in-place or if a new matrix is acceptable.
For each command, outline the algorithm: reverseRow reverses a specific row; swapRows swaps two rows; rotate90Clockwise can be done by transposing and reversing rows. Consider using helper functions for clarity.
Discuss time and space complexity for each command and the overall sequence. Compare in-place vs. copy approaches, and mention potential optimizations like lazy rotation if many commands are given.
Write clean code with meaningful variable names, handle edge cases (e.g., empty matrix, single row/column), and walk through a small example to verify correctness.
Check for off-by-one errors, ensure rotation is correct, and consider if any commands can be combined or if the matrix representation can be changed for efficiency.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.