My first instinct was a sorted list and just index from the end.
Clarify the requirements and constraints, then propose a data structure that supports efficient insert and findLargest operations. Discuss trade-offs between different approaches, such as a balanced BST with subtree sizes versus a Fenwick tree over compressed values, and analyze time and space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that duplicates must be handled correctly and that the (k+1)-th largest with 0-based indexing is equivalent to the k-th order statistic from the largest. Also, consider edge cases like k out of bounds and dynamic value ranges.
Confirm that insert can be called multiple times with the same value, findLargest(k) returns the (k+1)-th largest (0-based), and discuss expected frequency of operations and value range.
Select a data structure that maintains order statistics efficiently, such as a balanced BST (e.g., Red-Black Tree) with subtree sizes or a Fenwick tree over compressed values.
Detail how insert updates the structure and how findLargest(k) traverses or queries to find the k-th largest element, handling duplicates appropriately.
State the time complexity for each operation (e.g., O(log n) for both) and space complexity, comparing with alternatives like sorting on demand.
Discuss handling of k out of bounds, empty structure, and potential need for dynamic resizing or coordinate compression.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.