← Via Transportation Interview Insights
My first instinct was to jump straight into solutions, which is the wrong move.
Start by clarifying the goal and scope: reducing ticket volume while maintaining or improving customer satisfaction. Then, propose a data-driven approach: analyze ticket data to identify top drivers, prioritize high-impact root causes, and design engineering solutions (e.g., product improvements, automation, self-service) to address them. Finally, define success metrics and iterate.
Pro tip: Emphasize that not all tickets are bad—some indicate valuable feedback. Focus on reducing avoidable contacts (e.g., 'where is my ride?') through product improvements, while ensuring critical issues still reach support.
Confirm the objective: reduce ticket volume without harming customer experience. Ask about current metrics, ticket categories, and any constraints.
Examine ticket data to identify top contact drivers (e.g., ride delays, payment issues, app bugs). Segment by user type, region, and time to find patterns.
Use impact/effort matrix to prioritize root causes. Focus on high-volume, solvable issues that can be addressed via engineering (e.g., improved ETA accuracy, proactive notifications).
Propose engineering solutions: product fixes (e.g., bug fixes), automation (e.g., chatbots for FAQs), self-service (e.g., in-app help center), and proactive communications (e.g., push notifications for delays).
Define success metrics (e.g., ticket volume reduction, CSAT, resolution time). A/B test changes, monitor impact, and iterate based on results.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.