My first instinct was to just sort by start time and walk through, which is the right move.
Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., input size, interval inclusivity, touching definition) and then propose a sort-based approach: sort intervals by start time, then iterate and merge overlapping or touching intervals into a result list. Discuss time and space complexity, and consider edge cases like empty input or single interval.
Pro tip: Mention that sorting is the key to achieving O(n log n) time, and explicitly state that you would handle touching intervals by checking if the next start is <= current end (or < if exclusive). This shows attention to detail and scalability, which Amazon values.
Ask about input size, whether intervals are inclusive/exclusive, and if touching intervals should be merged. Confirm output format and sorting order.
Propose sorting intervals by start time, then merging in a single pass. Explain why this is optimal (O(n log n) time) and simpler than alternatives like sweep line for this problem.
Describe iterating through sorted intervals, comparing each with the last merged interval, and merging if they overlap or touch. Otherwise, add the last merged interval to the result.
State time complexity O(n log n) due to sorting, space O(n) for output. Discuss edge cases: empty list, single interval, all overlapping, no overlaps, and intervals with same start.
Write clean code (e.g., Python) with clear variable names, handling edge cases, and possibly test with a small example to demonstrate correctness.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.