The core pairing logic wasn't too bad once I decided to group events by orderId and sort within each group.
Start by clarifying requirements and edge cases (e.g., overlapping intervals, missing events, timezone handling). Then design a solution that groups events by order ID, sorts them by timestamp, and computes active duration for completed orders within the pay period. Finally, analyze complexity and discuss extensibility for payment rules.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a hash map to group events by order ID and sort each group's events by timestamp, which handles unsorted input efficiently. Also, proactively discuss how to handle incomplete orders (e.g., ACCEPT without FULFILL) and whether to include them in the total.
Ask about the definition of 'active duration' (e.g., time between ACCEPT and FULFILL), how to handle orders with missing events, and whether the interval is inclusive. Confirm if only completed orders (with both ACCEPT and FULFILL) should be considered.
Group events by order ID using a hash map. For each order, sort events by timestamp, then find the ACCEPT and FULFILL events. Compute the duration if both exist and the FULFILL timestamp falls within the pay period. Sum durations for all completed orders.
Write clean code with helper functions for grouping and duration calculation. Test with unsorted events, orders spanning the interval boundary, and orders with missing events.
Explain that grouping takes O(n) time, sorting each group takes O(k log k) where k is events per order, leading to O(n log n) worst-case time. Space is O(n) for storing grouped events.
Describe how to extend the solution to calculate payment by applying pay rules (e.g., base rate + per-minute rate) to each order's active duration. Mention the need for a rules engine or strategy pattern to handle varying pay rules.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.