My first instinct was to split on dots and call it a day, which obviously breaks the moment you hit a bracket.
Start by clarifying the input structure and path syntax, then outline a parsing strategy that tokenizes the path into keys and indices. Implement the traversal iteratively or recursively, handling edge cases like missing keys, out-of-bounds indices, and invalid paths. Discuss trade-offs between simplicity and robustness, and consider performance implications for large structures.
Pro tip: Demonstrate production readiness by discussing how to handle edge cases gracefully (e.g., returning undefined instead of throwing) and mentioning potential security concerns like prototype pollution when accessing arbitrary paths.
Ask questions to confirm the data types (maps vs objects, arrays), path syntax rules, and expected behavior for missing paths or invalid inputs. This shows attention to detail and avoids ambiguity.
Explain how to tokenize the path string into an array of keys and indices, handling dot notation and bracket notation, including multiple indices like [2][13].
Describe iterating over the tokens, accessing each level of the structure, and handling both object properties and array indices. Consider iterative vs recursive approaches and their trade-offs.
Discuss how to handle missing keys, out-of-bounds indices, null/undefined values, and invalid path formats. Decide whether to return undefined, throw, or use a default value.
Mention time and space complexity (O(n) where n is path length), and potential optimizations like caching parsed paths or using a compiled accessor for repeated calls.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.