Structure your answer around a few concrete examples where AI tools made a measurable difference in your engineering workflow, then candidly discuss limitations you've encountered. Emphasize how you validate AI outputs and integrate them responsibly, showing both enthusiasm and critical judgment.
Pro tip: Frame AI as a productivity multiplier, not a replacement for engineering judgment—highlight a specific instance where you caught an AI mistake that would have caused a bug or outage.
List the specific AI tools you use daily (e.g., GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, Cursor, Tabnine) and briefly state what each is best at in your workflow.
Pick one or two tasks (e.g., writing boilerplate, debugging, generating tests) and describe before/after: time saved, quality improved, or new capability unlocked.
Describe how you verify AI-generated code—unit tests, code review, static analysis—and why you never merge without scrutiny.
Give specific examples of failures (e.g., hallucinated APIs, insecure patterns, outdated syntax) and how you handle them.
Tie your AI usage back to Rokt's values or engineering best practices, showing you think about maintainability, security, and team impact.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.