← Capital One Interview Insights
I started with the easy stuff, deposit and withdraw returning updated balances, getBalance, all fine.
Start by clarifying requirements and defining a clean API for the Transaction class, then walk through the core operations (deposit, withdraw, getBalance) with a focus on thread safety and atomicity. Use a lock or synchronized methods to handle concurrency, discuss error cases like insufficient funds, and finally extend the design to transfers by ensuring atomicity across two accounts.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of real-world banking constraints: mention that in production, you'd likely use database transactions with ACID properties rather than in-memory locks, and discuss how to avoid deadlocks in transfers by ordering locks consistently.
Ask about expected concurrency level, persistence needs, and whether transactions are logged. Define the public methods: deposit(amount), withdraw(amount), getBalance(), and possibly transfer(toAccount, amount).
Use a private lock object or synchronized methods to ensure atomicity. For getBalance, consider returning a snapshot. Explain how you prevent race conditions during simultaneous deposits/withdrawals.
Check for insufficient funds, negative amounts, and invalid account states. Throw appropriate exceptions (e.g., IllegalArgumentException, InsufficientFundsException) and ensure the account state remains consistent.
Maintain a list of transaction records (e.g., TransactionRecord objects) with timestamp, type, amount, and resulting balance. Discuss whether to store in-memory or persist to a database.
Implement transfer by locking both accounts in a consistent order to avoid deadlocks, then atomically withdraw from one and deposit to the other. Discuss failure scenarios and rollback.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.