This question is basically five questions wearing a trench coat.
Start by clarifying functional and non-functional requirements, then propose a high-level architecture that separates ranking computation from serving. Dive into the ranking logic (e.g., Wilson score, time decay) and explain how ML models can be integrated for personalization. Finally, discuss scalability, trade-offs, and evaluation metrics.
Pro tip: Emphasize the balance between freshness and quality, and how you would handle cold-start and feedback loops. Mention that ranking is not just a batch job but requires real-time updates and A/B testing infrastructure.
Ask about scale (DAU, posts, comments), latency requirements, and whether ranking should be personalized. Define functional requirements: sort comments by relevance, allow upvotes/downvotes, and handle time decay.
Outline components: ingestion (votes, comments), storage (SQL/NoSQL for comments, votes), ranking service (batch and real-time), cache (Redis), and API. Discuss data flow from user action to updated ranking.
Explain base ranking algorithm (e.g., Wilson score, Hacker News formula) with time decay. Discuss how to incorporate user-specific signals (personalization) and ML models (e.g., gradient boosted trees) for predicting comment quality.
Address scaling: sharding by post ID, caching hot posts, precomputing scores for inactive posts. Discuss trade-offs between batch vs. real-time, consistency vs. latency, and complexity vs. maintainability.
Describe ML pipeline: feature engineering (user, comment, context), model training (offline), and serving (online). Discuss evaluation metrics (NDCG, CTR), A/B testing, and handling feedback loops.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.