I knew the formulas going in but the geometric part tripped me up more than I expected.
Start by writing the two ordinary least squares (OLS) slope formulas, then show algebraically why they are not reciprocals unless the correlation is perfect. Follow with the geometric intuition: OLS minimizes vertical errors, so swapping X and Y changes the objective and the fitted line.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the product of the two slopes equals R², which is at most 1, so the slopes are reciprocals only when the fit is perfect. This shows you understand the deeper statistical relationship and can connect it to practical model evaluation.
Write the formulas for the slope of Y on X (β_YX = Cov(X,Y)/Var(X)) and the slope of X on Y (β_XY = Cov(X,Y)/Var(Y)).
Multiply the two slopes: β_YX * β_XY = [Cov(X,Y)]² / (Var(X)Var(Y)) = R². Since R² ≤ 1, the product is not 1 unless R²=1, so they are not reciprocals in general.
OLS minimizes vertical squared errors. Regressing Y on X minimizes vertical distances to the line; regressing X on Y minimizes horizontal distances. These are different objectives, so the best-fit lines differ.
Note that the slopes depend on the variances of X and Y. If the variances are unequal, the slopes will not be reciprocals even if the correlation is high.
Conclude that the asymmetry arises because OLS treats the variables asymmetrically: one is the predictor, the other the response. The reciprocal relationship only holds when the relationship is perfectly linear (R²=1).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.