← Snowflake Interview Insights
This one took me a minute to even scope correctly.
Start by clarifying requirements (K, window size, definition of 'trending', scale, latency). Then propose a high-level architecture using a streaming pipeline with per-user deduplication, windowed aggregation, and a top-K data structure, discussing trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency.
Pro tip: Mention that exact top-K with sliding windows is expensive, so consider approximate algorithms like Count-Min Sketch with a heap, and discuss how to handle late data and out-of-order events.
Ask about K, window size (e.g., 5 minutes), sliding vs tumbling, scale (QPS, unique users), latency, and whether exact or approximate results are acceptable.
Propose a streaming pipeline: ingest searches, deduplicate per user per window, aggregate counts, and compute top-K. Use a distributed stream processor like Flink or Kafka Streams.
For each user, track the set of search terms seen in the current window (e.g., using a Redis set or in-memory state with TTL) to count each term only once per user per window.
Maintain counts per term in the window using a sliding window aggregation. For top-K, use a min-heap of size K or approximate sketches (Count-Min Sketch) for scalability.
Discuss trade-offs: exact vs approximate, memory vs accuracy, handling late data, and scaling via sharding by term or user. Mention eviction policies and periodic recomputation.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.