← Applied intuition Interview Insights
I went straight to a min-heap sorted by next-fire time, which felt right and they didn't push back on it.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints (single CPU, single thread, API semantics). Then propose a min-heap keyed by next execution time, explain the core loop that sleeps until the earliest task, and discuss handling of late wake-ups, drift, and cancellation. Conclude with trade-offs and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Emphasize that periodic tasks should be rescheduled based on their scheduled time, not actual wake-up time, to prevent drift accumulation. Also, mention that cancellation can be lazy (mark as cancelled) to avoid O(n) removal from the heap.
Confirm assumptions: single CPU, single thread, tasks are independent, and APIs for one-time absolute, one-time delayed, and periodic tasks. Define method signatures and return handles for cancellation.
Use a min-heap (priority queue) ordered by next execution time. The core loop peeks the earliest task, sleeps until its time (or until a new earlier task arrives), then executes and reschedules if periodic.
For late wake-ups, execute immediately and log the delay. For periodic tasks, compute the next run time as previous scheduled time + interval (not actual time) to avoid drift; optionally skip missed intervals if the system was suspended.
Use lazy cancellation: mark tasks as cancelled and skip them when popped. For thread safety (if APIs can be called from other threads), protect the heap with a mutex and use a condition variable to wake the scheduler when a new task is added.
Cover trade-offs: heap vs. timing wheel, precision vs. overhead, and handling of clock changes. Mention edge cases: empty heap, task execution time exceeding interval, and system sleep.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.