I knew LIS was involved pretty quickly but fumbled the sorting step for a few minutes.
Recognize this as a 2D version of the Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) problem. Sort envelopes by width ascending and, for equal widths, sort height descending to prevent nesting envelopes of the same width. Then find the LIS of the heights using an O(n log n) patience sorting approach.
Pro tip: Mention that sorting height descending for equal widths is crucial to avoid incorrectly counting multiple envelopes with the same width as nestable. Also, discuss edge cases like duplicate envelopes and the time/space complexity trade-offs.
Clarify that an envelope can only contain another if both width and height are strictly larger. The goal is to find the maximum chain length.
Sort by width ascending. For equal widths, sort by height descending. This ensures that when we process heights, we don't accidentally nest envelopes of the same width.
Extract the heights in the sorted order. The problem now becomes finding the Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) of these heights.
Use the patience sorting algorithm (binary search) to find the LIS in O(n log n) time. Alternatively, dynamic programming gives O(n^2) but is less optimal.
The length of the LIS is the maximum number of envelopes that can be nested.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.