I went with React because that's what I'm most comfortable with, but looking back I wonder if vanilla JS would've impressed them more since it shows you understand the fundamentals without leaning on a framework.
Start by clarifying requirements (e.g., autoplay, navigation controls, responsiveness, accessibility) and then outline a component-based architecture. Discuss trade-offs between React and vanilla JS, focusing on maintainability, performance, and reusability. Walk through the implementation details, including state management, event handling, and optimization techniques.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of accessibility (keyboard navigation, ARIA roles) and performance (lazy loading, image optimization) to show you think beyond basic functionality. Also, mention how you would test the carousel (unit, integration, visual) to ensure reliability.
Ask questions to understand the expected features: number of images, autoplay, navigation arrows/dots, infinite loop, responsiveness, accessibility, and browser support. This shows you prioritize user needs and avoid assumptions.
Decide between React and vanilla JS based on project context. For React, outline component structure (e.g., Carousel, Slide, Controls) and state management (useState/useReducer). For vanilla JS, describe DOM manipulation and event delegation.
Explain how to render images, handle navigation (next/prev, dots), and manage state (current index). Discuss edge cases like wrapping around and disabling buttons at ends if not infinite.
Add performance optimizations (lazy loading, preloading adjacent images), accessibility features (keyboard support, ARIA labels), and responsive design (CSS transitions, touch support).
Describe testing strategy: unit tests for logic, integration tests for interactions, and visual regression tests. Mention how you would handle feedback and iterate.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.