I started with cost and time-to-market because those felt safest, but I could tell partway through that wasn't landing as the interesting part.
Start by clarifying the strategic context and the problem the system solves, then evaluate build vs. buy against a consistent set of criteria weighted by business priorities. Conclude with a recommendation that balances short-term needs with long-term strategic flexibility, and outline next steps for validation.
Pro tip: Frame the decision as a portfolio choice: not every system needs to be a differentiator, so reserve build resources for areas of core strategic value and buy or partner for commodity capabilities. Also, consider a hybrid approach where you buy the base and build only the differentiating layer on top.
Define the problem, business goals, and must-have requirements. Identify whether the system is core to your competitive advantage or a supporting capability.
Assess each option on cost (TCO), time-to-market, scalability, maintenance burden, vendor lock-in, and strategic differentiation. Use a weighted scoring model to compare objectively.
Explore hybrid approaches (e.g., buy core, build extensions), open-source solutions, or partnerships. Evaluate trade-offs of each.
Synthesize findings into a clear recommendation, highlighting key trade-offs and risks. Align with stakeholders on the decision.
Outline a plan to validate assumptions (e.g., pilot, prototype, vendor trial) and measure success. Include a contingency plan.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.