← Capital One Interview Insights
My first instinct was brute force, just nested loops, and it works but I knew they'd push back on efficiency.
Use a hash map to store the frequency of each word in the list. For each word, check if it is a prefix of the target; if so, compute the required suffix and add the frequency of that suffix from the map, subtracting 1 if the word equals the suffix to avoid using the same index twice. This yields O(n * L) time where L is the target length, which is efficient.
Pro tip: Clarify edge cases upfront, such as empty strings, duplicate words, and the i != j condition, and mention that you would handle them explicitly. Also, discuss time and space complexity trade-offs to demonstrate algorithmic maturity.
Restate the problem to ensure clarity: count ordered pairs (i, j) with i != j such that words[i] + words[j] == target. Identify edge cases like empty strings, duplicate words, and when no pairs exist.
Use a hash map to store the frequency of each word. This allows O(1) lookups for the required suffix, making the solution efficient.
For each word, check if it is a prefix of the target. If so, compute the suffix needed and add the frequency of that suffix from the map, adjusting for the i != j condition when the word equals the suffix.
When the word equals the required suffix, subtract 1 from the frequency to avoid pairing the word with itself. This ensures i != j.
State the time complexity O(n * L) and space complexity O(n). Walk through a small example to verify correctness, including edge cases.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.