← Walmart Labs Interview Insights
My first instinct was brute force, check every pair of intervals, which I knew was wrong but I said it anyway to buy time.
Clarify the problem and edge cases, then propose an event-based sweep line algorithm: create events for each route's start (+1) and end (-1), sort them, and sweep to track the maximum concurrent routes. Explain the algorithm step-by-step, prove its correctness, and state the time and space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that sorting end events before start events at the same timestamp correctly handles the half-open interval [start, end), and note that if times are bounded integers, a counting sort can achieve O(N + K) time.
Confirm the interval semantics (inclusive start, exclusive end), input format, and any constraints on N or time values. Discuss edge cases like empty input, single route, or all routes overlapping.
Create events: for each route, add (start, +1) and (end, -1). Sort events by time, with end events before start events at the same time to respect the half-open interval. Sweep through events, maintaining a running count and updating the maximum.
Illustrate with a small example (e.g., routes [1,4), [2,5), [3,6)) to show how the count changes and the maximum is found. This demonstrates understanding and catches off-by-one errors.
Argue that the running count equals the number of active routes at any time, and since we check the count after every event, the maximum is captured. The tie-breaking rule ensures intervals ending at time t are not counted as active at t.
Sorting 2N events takes O(N log N) time; sweeping takes O(N) time. Space is O(N) for events. Mention that if times are small integers, counting sort can reduce time to O(N + K).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.