← Databricks Interview Insights
I started with the obvious brute force and they let me finish before asking if I could do better.
Use a sliding window of length equal to the pattern string and compare character frequency counts. Maintain a frequency map for the pattern and update the window's frequency map incrementally to achieve O(n) time. Alternatively, use a rolling hash to compare sorted strings or frequency arrays, but the frequency map approach is more efficient.
Pro tip: Clarify edge cases upfront, such as when the pattern is longer than the text or when there are duplicate characters. Also, mention that the solution can be optimized by using an array of size 26 for lowercase English letters to reduce overhead.
Confirm that anagrams are case-sensitive and consider only lowercase English letters. Ask if the output should be sorted or in any order.
Use a frequency array or hash map to count characters in the pattern and the sliding window. For fixed alphabet, an array of size 26 is optimal.
Initialize the window with the first len(pattern) characters. Slide the window one character at a time, updating the frequency counts by removing the left character and adding the right character.
Maintain a count of how many characters have matching frequencies to avoid comparing entire arrays each time. When the match count equals the number of distinct characters in the pattern, record the start index.
State that time complexity is O(n) and space O(1) for fixed alphabet. Discuss edge cases like empty strings, pattern longer than text, and repeated characters.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.