I jumped straight to Kahn's algorithm which was the right call, but I fumbled the tie-breaking part for a bit.
Use Kahn's algorithm (BFS-based topological sort) with a priority queue to break ties according to the given ordering criterion. Track in-degrees, enqueue all initially ready tasks, and repeatedly extract the highest-priority task, decrementing in-degrees of its dependents. If the output order doesn't include all tasks, report a cycle.
Pro tip: Mention that Kahn's algorithm naturally detects cycles: if the final order has fewer than N tasks, a cycle exists. Also, discuss how the choice of data structure (e.g., binary heap vs. bucket queue) affects time complexity, especially if the ordering criterion is dynamic or custom.
Confirm the ordering criterion (e.g., ascending ID, descending priority) and whether the graph is guaranteed to be a DAG. Ask about input size and performance expectations.
Select Kahn's algorithm for its simplicity and natural cycle detection. Explain that DFS-based topological sort is an alternative but requires separate cycle detection.
Use an adjacency list for the graph, an array for in-degrees, and a priority queue (or custom heap) to efficiently retrieve the next ready task according to the tie-breaking rule.
Initialize in-degrees, enqueue all tasks with in-degree 0, then repeatedly extract the highest-priority task, append to order, and decrement in-degrees of its neighbors, enqueueing those that become 0.
After processing, if the order length is less than N, a cycle exists; report it (optionally identify the cycle). Discuss edge cases like empty graph, single node, or multiple components.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.