My first instinct was to just do two root-to-node path traversals and find where they diverge, which works fine.
Use a post-order DFS that returns the node if it matches either target, otherwise recursively searches children. At each node, if two or more children return non-null results (or one child plus the node itself matches), the current node is the LCA. If only one child returns a result, propagate it upward; if none, return null.
Pro tip: Clarify edge cases upfront: whether the tree is static, if node IDs are unique, and if a node can be an ancestor of itself. This shows thoroughness and avoids incorrect assumptions.
Ask about tree size, node ID uniqueness, and whether a node can be its own ancestor. Confirm return type (node object vs. ID) and handling of missing nodes.
Select a recursive post-order DFS because it naturally processes children before the parent, allowing LCA detection when results from multiple subtrees combine.
The function returns the LCA if found, or the target node if only one is found in the subtree, or null otherwise. At each node, check if it matches a target and recursively process all children.
Count how many children return non-null. If the current node matches a target, increment count. If count >= 2, return current node as LCA; if count == 1, return the non-null result; else return null.
After traversal, if the result is not the LCA (e.g., only one target found), return null. Walk through examples and discuss time/space complexity.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.