← Confluent Interview Insights
I jumped straight to Bloom filters for the uniqueness check which felt smart in the moment, but then the interviewer pushed on false positives and I kind of fumbled.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then propose a generation strategy that combines human-like name components with a unique suffix or encoding. Address uniqueness through a distributed ID generator or probabilistic data structure, and design storage and lookup for low latency and high throughput. Discuss trade-offs between consistency, latency, and cost.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the system must never delete old addresses, so storage grows unbounded; propose a tiered storage strategy with hot/warm/cold data and consider using a compact encoding to reduce storage footprint.
Ask about expected read/write patterns, latency requirements, and whether addresses need to be human-readable or just look human-like. Confirm the scale: hundreds of millions per day implies ~2-3k writes/sec average, but plan for bursts.
Propose generating addresses from a large pool of first and last names, combined with a unique numeric or alphanumeric suffix (e.g., john.doe.1234@domain). Ensure the format resembles real human emails and avoids patterns that spam filters flag.
Use a distributed unique ID generator (e.g., Snowflake) to create the suffix, or use a centralized counter with sharding. Alternatively, use a hash of the name components plus a random salt, and check for collisions probabilistically.
Store addresses in a distributed key-value store (e.g., Cassandra, DynamoDB) with the address as the key and metadata as the value. Use consistent hashing for partitioning. For low-latency lookup, cache hot addresses in memory (e.g., Redis) and use SSD-based storage for cold data.
Discuss trade-offs: strong vs. eventual consistency for uniqueness, cost of storage vs. latency, and the impact of never deleting data. Propose sharding, replication, and tiered storage to handle growth.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.