Spent probably too long on the date parsing piece because there were multiple formats mixed in the same column and I kept second-guessing whether to use a strict parser or try-except fallbacks.
Start by profiling the data to quantify each issue, then design a modular pipeline with separate cleaning functions per column, and finish with a validation layer that checks both data quality metrics and business rules. Emphasize idempotency, logging, and how you'd handle edge cases like ambiguous dates or unknown payment methods.
Pro tip: Mention that you'd preserve the original raw data and log every transformation, so you can audit changes and re-run the pipeline safely—this shows production maturity and aligns with Tesla's data-driven culture.
Run initial data profiling to measure the extent of each problem (e.g., % of rows with bad dates, invalid payment methods) and identify edge cases like multiple date formats or currency symbols.
Create separate, testable functions for each column: parse dates with a fallback strategy, strip currency symbols and convert amounts to numeric, restore leading zeros using a fixed width or lookup, and normalize payment methods via mapping or fuzzy matching.
Chain the functions in a pipeline that logs every transformation, handles errors gracefully (e.g., quarantine bad rows), and can be re-run without side effects.
After cleaning, run validation checks: schema conformance, range checks (e.g., amounts > 0), referential integrity (customer IDs exist), and business rules (e.g., payment methods in allowed set).
Set up metrics and alerts for data quality issues in production, and plan for periodic reviews to adapt to new data patterns or sources.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.