← Anthropic Interview Insights
This question has a lot of layers and I kept getting pulled into the wrong ones first.
Structure your answer as a multi-stage pipeline: first enumerate files and group by size, then hash only same-size candidates using a streaming hash, and finally verify byte-by-byte before hard-linking. Emphasize memory efficiency, collision handling, and safe parallelization across cores and machines.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a two-level hashing strategy: a fast non-cryptographic hash (e.g., xxHash) for initial grouping, then a cryptographic hash (e.g., BLAKE3) for verification, and finally a byte-by-byte comparison to eliminate any collision risk. Also note that hard-linking should be done atomically and only after verifying content, and that you'd preserve one canonical copy per inode.
Walk the directory tree and collect file paths with their sizes, grouping files by size. Files with unique sizes cannot be duplicates, so they are skipped, drastically reducing the candidate set.
For each size group, compute a hash of each file using a streaming API (e.g., read in chunks) so files are never fully loaded into memory. Use a fast hash first, then a cryptographic hash for stronger guarantees.
When hashes match, perform a byte-by-byte comparison to confirm true duplicates. This eliminates any chance of hash collisions causing data loss.
For each set of verified duplicates, keep one canonical file and replace the others with hard links to it. Ensure atomicity and handle cross-filesystem cases by copying or skipping.
Use a work queue to distribute files across threads/processes for hashing, and shard by directory or hash prefix across machines. Aggregate results and perform linking in a coordinated phase.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.