← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Apr 2026

Summary

Google SWE coding round with a DP-flavored array problem. Pretty classic Google style where the base case seems manageable and then they hit you with a follow-up that actually requires you to think.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

You have a 1D array of positive integers and start at index 0. At each index you can either take the value as profit and jump forward by that value plus one, or skip it and just move to the next index. What's the maximum total profit you can collect before going past the end of the array?

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Spent a bit too long trying to think of a greedy approach before accepting it's just DP.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Define a DP state where dp[i] represents the maximum profit starting from index i. For each index, consider the two choices: take the value and jump to i + value + 1, or skip and move to i + 1, then take the maximum. Compute dp from right to left, returning dp[0].

Pro tip: Clarify that 'going past the end' means the jump lands at or beyond the array length, and mention that you can optimize space to O(1) by only keeping the next few states if the values are bounded, but O(n) is fine.

1. Clarify the problem

Restate the rules: start at index 0, at each index either take the value and jump forward by value+1, or skip and move to next index. Confirm that the goal is to maximize total profit before the index goes out of bounds.

2. Define the DP state

Let dp[i] be the maximum profit obtainable starting from index i. The answer will be dp[0].

3. Formulate recurrence

At index i, if i >= n, dp[i] = 0. Otherwise, dp[i] = max(arr[i] + dp[i + arr[i] + 1], dp[i + 1]).

4. Compute bottom-up

Iterate i from n-1 down to 0, filling the dp array. Handle out-of-bounds indices by treating dp[j] = 0 for j >= n.

5. Analyze complexity and edge cases

Time complexity O(n), space O(n). Discuss edge cases: empty array, single element, large jumps, and all elements positive.

Key Points to Mention

  • Dynamic programming with optimal substructure and overlapping subproblems.
  • State definition: dp[i] = max profit from index i to end.
  • Recurrence relation: dp[i] = max(arr[i] + dp[i + arr[i] + 1], dp[i + 1]).
  • Base case: dp[i] = 0 for i >= n.
  • Time and space complexity: O(n) time, O(n) space; can optimize to O(1) space if max jump is bounded.
  • Edge cases: empty array, single element, jumps that exactly reach the end.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Follow-up: how does your solution change if the array can also contain negative numbers?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is where I fumbled a bit.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the original problem and solution, then analyze how negative numbers affect the underlying assumptions. Discuss necessary modifications to the algorithm, such as changing data structures or handling edge cases, and compare trade-offs in time and space complexity.

Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness that negative numbers can break greedy approaches or sliding window techniques, and proactively mention how you would test the modified solution with mixed-sign inputs.

1. Restate the original problem and solution

Briefly summarize the initial problem and your approach, highlighting key assumptions that may be invalidated by negative numbers.

2. Identify impacted assumptions

Determine which parts of your solution rely on non-negativity, such as monotonicity, prefix sums, or two-pointer techniques.

3. Propose modifications

Describe how to adapt the algorithm, e.g., using Kadane's algorithm for maximum subarray, dynamic programming, or a different data structure.

4. Analyze trade-offs

Compare the modified solution's time and space complexity with the original, and discuss any new edge cases.

5. Validate with examples

Walk through a small example with negative numbers to confirm correctness and mention testing strategies.

Key Points to Mention

  • Kadane's algorithm for maximum subarray sum when negatives are allowed
  • Impact on sliding window techniques (e.g., window sum may decrease)
  • Use of prefix sums with hash maps for subarray sum problems
  • Handling of edge cases like all negatives or zeros
  • Time and space complexity changes
  • Importance of clarifying problem constraints upfront

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.